news
06-19-2012, 01:07 AM
In a 5-to-4 decision the justices said allowing expert testimony did not violate the confrontation clause, but no rationale received the votes of the majority.
http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?p=1 (http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?p=1)
More... (http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=e911eb1735a13bdb769eeab11ac2627e)
http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?p=1 (http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?p=1)
More... (http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=e911eb1735a13bdb769eeab11ac2627e)