news
07-25-2015, 12:51 AM
Outspoken atheist writer Richard Dawkins took to Twitter this week to air concerns (https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/624104581253963776) about the status of women in Islam. Needless to say, his unsolicited advice to a religion of 1.6 billion people didn't sit well with many.
Islam needs a feminist revolution. It will be hard. What can we do to help?
— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) July 23, 2015 (https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/624104581253963776)
"Change must come from within our global Muslim society," British philanthropist Yasmin Choudry responded (https://twitter.com/yasminisyasmin/status/624502341677486080) on Twitter.
Others challenged Dawkins for what they saw as his patronizing tone. Muslim women have "been through this before," Hind Makki, a well-known Muslim blogger, told The Huffington Post.
"When Europe began colonizing Muslim lands at the turn of the 20th century, we were told by white European men that their dismantling of our religious, economic, cultural, and political systems were for our own good -- that we Muslim women needed saving from Muslim men, by Christian European men."
Makki's response to such outreach? "No thanks," she said.
Muslim activist Linda Sarsour said she was "tired of non-Muslims commenting on what Islam is or isn't." She added: "As a Muslim woman, I have the agency to tell you that Islam is a feminist religion and informs my role and positions on women's rights issues. I am a feminist because I am Muslim."
.@RichardDawkins (https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins) needs to abandon his patronizing white savior paternalist Islamophobia. It will be hard. What can we do to help?
— hijabi princess (@redbeansrule) July 24, 2015 (https://twitter.com/redbeansrule/status/624562172178239489)
we can start with the fact that nobody wants your help pic.twitter.com/Pr7BT2W8Zd (http://t.co/Pr7BT2W8Zd)
— bagel (@BagelSmalls) July 23, 2015 (https://twitter.com/BagelSmalls/status/624308638459363328)
@fredrik77a (https://twitter.com/fredrik77a) @DanielWickham93 (https://twitter.com/DanielWickham93) @RichardDawkins (https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins) but despite not being a Muslim women you feel you understand us better then I do?
— Nazia Mirza (@naziasmirza) July 23, 2015 (https://twitter.com/naziasmirza/status/624318944178868228)
Dawkins stood by his earlier tweet, writing:
The idea that an uncovered woman invites assault degrades women & insults men. Should be free to wear anything or nothing & stay unmolested.
— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) July 23, 2015 (https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/624215555625623552)
Though the sentiment Dawkins expressed on Twitter Thursday may come from a good place, his argument ignores the fact that many Muslim women choose to wear the hijab and other forms of coverings -- and feel empowered doing so (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/14/opinion/the-freedom-of-the-hijab.html?_r=0).
And as Sarsour mentioned, countless Muslim women and men are already working for women's rights (http://start.westnet.ca/newstempch.php?article=bina-shah/islam-not-misogynistic_b_7842274.html)and challenging stereotypes (http://start.westnet.ca/newstempch.php?article=entry/ragbrai-muslim-women_55b14a03e4b07af29d57f69b) that are too-often perpetuated in the media.
Dawkins pointed to child marriage, female genital mutilation and other atrocities in some countries as evidence of Islam's inherent bias against women.
He may want to revisit Reza Aslan's explanation of why it's problematic to make generalizations about "the Muslim world":
Women's rights is an issue that governments, religious institutions, and communities the world over (http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/ng-interactive/2014/feb/04/womens-rights-country-by-country-interactive) must address, and there is certainly a long way to go. But by pointing the finger at one religion, Dawkins seems to suggest that the rest of the world has figured out women's equality -- which it very much has not (http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/16/us/american-women-world-rankings/).
Qasim Rashid, a prominent Muslim author and lawyer, offered his own advice to Dawkins, tweeting:
Hey @RichardDawkins (https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins) this is where you follow through on "how to help" by being quiet & listening https://t.co/42KMBHSipo
— Qasim Rashid, Esq. (@MuslimIQ) July 24, 2015 (https://twitter.com/MuslimIQ/status/624679222603313152)
Also on HuffPost:
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. (http://start.westnet.ca/newstempch.php?article=terms.html/) It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/rc/1/rc.img (http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/rc/1/rc.htm)
http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/rc/2/rc.img (http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/rc/2/rc.htm)
http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/rc/3/rc.img (http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/rc/3/rc.htm)
http://da.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/a2.img (http://da.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/a2.htm)
http://adchoice.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/ach.img (http://adchoice.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/ach.htm)http://pi.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/a2t.imghttp://pi2.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/a2t2.imghttp://feeds.huffingtonpost.com/c/35496/f/677045/s/486bc339/sc/7/mf.gif
More... (http://feeds.huffingtonpost.com/c/35496/f/677045/s/486bc339/sc/7/l/0L0Shuffingtonpost0N0C20A150C0A70C240Crichard0Edaw kins0Eislam0Efeminist0Erevolution0In0I78689840Bhtm l/story01.htm)
Islam needs a feminist revolution. It will be hard. What can we do to help?
— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) July 23, 2015 (https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/624104581253963776)
"Change must come from within our global Muslim society," British philanthropist Yasmin Choudry responded (https://twitter.com/yasminisyasmin/status/624502341677486080) on Twitter.
Others challenged Dawkins for what they saw as his patronizing tone. Muslim women have "been through this before," Hind Makki, a well-known Muslim blogger, told The Huffington Post.
"When Europe began colonizing Muslim lands at the turn of the 20th century, we were told by white European men that their dismantling of our religious, economic, cultural, and political systems were for our own good -- that we Muslim women needed saving from Muslim men, by Christian European men."
Makki's response to such outreach? "No thanks," she said.
Muslim activist Linda Sarsour said she was "tired of non-Muslims commenting on what Islam is or isn't." She added: "As a Muslim woman, I have the agency to tell you that Islam is a feminist religion and informs my role and positions on women's rights issues. I am a feminist because I am Muslim."
.@RichardDawkins (https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins) needs to abandon his patronizing white savior paternalist Islamophobia. It will be hard. What can we do to help?
— hijabi princess (@redbeansrule) July 24, 2015 (https://twitter.com/redbeansrule/status/624562172178239489)
we can start with the fact that nobody wants your help pic.twitter.com/Pr7BT2W8Zd (http://t.co/Pr7BT2W8Zd)
— bagel (@BagelSmalls) July 23, 2015 (https://twitter.com/BagelSmalls/status/624308638459363328)
@fredrik77a (https://twitter.com/fredrik77a) @DanielWickham93 (https://twitter.com/DanielWickham93) @RichardDawkins (https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins) but despite not being a Muslim women you feel you understand us better then I do?
— Nazia Mirza (@naziasmirza) July 23, 2015 (https://twitter.com/naziasmirza/status/624318944178868228)
Dawkins stood by his earlier tweet, writing:
The idea that an uncovered woman invites assault degrades women & insults men. Should be free to wear anything or nothing & stay unmolested.
— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) July 23, 2015 (https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/624215555625623552)
Though the sentiment Dawkins expressed on Twitter Thursday may come from a good place, his argument ignores the fact that many Muslim women choose to wear the hijab and other forms of coverings -- and feel empowered doing so (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/14/opinion/the-freedom-of-the-hijab.html?_r=0).
And as Sarsour mentioned, countless Muslim women and men are already working for women's rights (http://start.westnet.ca/newstempch.php?article=bina-shah/islam-not-misogynistic_b_7842274.html)and challenging stereotypes (http://start.westnet.ca/newstempch.php?article=entry/ragbrai-muslim-women_55b14a03e4b07af29d57f69b) that are too-often perpetuated in the media.
Dawkins pointed to child marriage, female genital mutilation and other atrocities in some countries as evidence of Islam's inherent bias against women.
He may want to revisit Reza Aslan's explanation of why it's problematic to make generalizations about "the Muslim world":
Women's rights is an issue that governments, religious institutions, and communities the world over (http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/ng-interactive/2014/feb/04/womens-rights-country-by-country-interactive) must address, and there is certainly a long way to go. But by pointing the finger at one religion, Dawkins seems to suggest that the rest of the world has figured out women's equality -- which it very much has not (http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/16/us/american-women-world-rankings/).
Qasim Rashid, a prominent Muslim author and lawyer, offered his own advice to Dawkins, tweeting:
Hey @RichardDawkins (https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins) this is where you follow through on "how to help" by being quiet & listening https://t.co/42KMBHSipo
— Qasim Rashid, Esq. (@MuslimIQ) July 24, 2015 (https://twitter.com/MuslimIQ/status/624679222603313152)
Also on HuffPost:
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. (http://start.westnet.ca/newstempch.php?article=terms.html/) It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/rc/1/rc.img (http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/rc/1/rc.htm)
http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/rc/2/rc.img (http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/rc/2/rc.htm)
http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/rc/3/rc.img (http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/rc/3/rc.htm)
http://da.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/a2.img (http://da.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/a2.htm)
http://adchoice.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/ach.img (http://adchoice.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/ach.htm)http://pi.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/a2t.imghttp://pi2.feedsportal.com/r/234566085976/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/486bc339/sc/7/a2t2.imghttp://feeds.huffingtonpost.com/c/35496/f/677045/s/486bc339/sc/7/mf.gif
More... (http://feeds.huffingtonpost.com/c/35496/f/677045/s/486bc339/sc/7/l/0L0Shuffingtonpost0N0C20A150C0A70C240Crichard0Edaw kins0Eislam0Efeminist0Erevolution0In0I78689840Bhtm l/story01.htm)