news
09-28-2015, 04:30 PM
Over the past two weeks, two powerful stories have dominated headlines: one is the refugee crisis, which I reflected on in my previous blog entry (http://start.westnet.ca/newstempch.php?article=otto-scharmer/shifting-the-logic-of-col_b_8100068.html), and the other is the diesel deception scandal that has brought Volkswagen to the brink of collapse. These stories represent powerful yet very different social fields (http://start.westnet.ca/newstempch.php?article=otto-scharmer/uncovering-the-grammar-of-the-social-field_b_7524910.html) - by which I mean the structure of the relationship among individuals, groups, organizations and systems that gives rise to collective behaviors and outcomes - which are co-shaping our global condition today. Those social fields are:
• The field of "absencing," as embodied in the VW story: denial, de-sensing, hubris, deception, and destruction;
• The field of "presencing," as embodied in the response to the refugee crisis: seeing, sensing, stillness, crystallizing, and co-creating.
Much has been said about the moral dimension of the VW diesel deception. The company betrayed its customers, the public, and the planet by building "defeat devices" into 11 million of its cars (devices designed to switch off emission controls whenever the car is in normal use).
But there's a question that has not been answered yet: Why? How can a company that relies so completely on reputation and brand perception behave with such unbelievable stupidity and irresponsibility? Here is how the German newsmagazine Der Spiegel covered the story this week under the header "the suicide."
http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2015-09-28-1443456587-9181056-ScreenShot20150927at12.30.44PM-thumb.png (http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2015-09-28-1443456587-9181056-ScreenShot20150927at12.30.44PM.png)
The company essentially killed itself. How could VW have possibly believed that such a deception would go undiscovered? All it took was a small experiment--with two cars and two measuring devices, and a few hundred miles of driving--initiated by the Berlin office of ICCT, a respected international NGO.
The answer to these questions, to the extent that we know anything today, seems to boil down to seven words: The fish rots from the head down. It's a saying in Germany and other places that means: the problem starts at the top.
The cycle of absencing
The VW disaster is a leadership failure of epic proportion. It's connected to a leadership style and culture that, until now, was the source of incredible pride and success. Until a few days ago, the rise of VW and Audi from a sleepy German carmaker to a global powerhouse with 600,000 employees, 12 different auto brands, and more than 100 factories and plants in 31 countries, was a company saga admired around the world. Yet, the same cultural genes that gave rise to all of VW's successes have suddenly turned into the seeds of its unfolding self-destruction. The firm was and is dominated by old white males obsessed with becoming the world's biggest carmaker. Its top-down and control-based leadership culture, once a source of success, now prevented leaders from reading and recognizing information that, in a culture of fear and control, no one ever wants to communicate upwards - thereby preventing the company from learning as a system.
Lets look at the phenomenology of this learning disability in more detail. Here are five core features that define this "cycle of absencing" (self-destruction):
Denial: VW failed to heed the early warning signals that came its way. These included a letter from its supplier Bosch in 2007 (after VW decided to opt out of BlueTec, an NOx reducing technology co-developed by Bosch and Mercedes), a warning from its corporate revision in 2011, and the sharing from test results by ICCT in 2014 and the EPA in 2015 when the symptoms of the scandal started surfacing. VW dismissed, ignored, or, when confronted with the test results, chose to not address these warnings with an appropriate (open) mind.
De-sensing: The leaders of VW amplified the problems by disconnecting themselves from the values and trajectory of society by entrenching and isolating themselves in what another executive in the auto industry once called a "bullshit-castle"--that is, a world that is cut off from the emerging societal future such as the environmental movement. Germany, probably more than any other major industrial country, has been strongly shaped an influenced by the environmental movement. That VW, a Germany company, thought it was an option to install defeat devices that lie to the consumer and to the public about its actual emission demonstrates a breathtaking level of cynicism and disconnection from the ecological and societal realities of our time.
Hubris: No engineer wakes up in the morning and thinks: OK, today I want to build devices that deceive our customers and destroy our planet. Yet it happened. Why? Because of hubris at the top. VW's relentless pursuit of its goal to be bigger than anyone else produced huge internal pressure to increase volume and reduce costs. "Clean diesel" was a big part of this strategy. Add to that a top-down culture that didn't tolerate anyone who said, "We can't do that." That pressure set a context that made VW decline the use of BlueTec (presumably too costly) and turn to an internal solution instead.
Deception: Deception and manipulation show up in many forms. Volkswagen deceived its customers, the public and of course governmental agencies like the EPA. But it also deceived itself. Even though the information about the diesel deception scandal continued to surface and was communicated to the company by the ICCP (in 2014) and the EPA (in 2015)--the company continued to sail on its collision path, keeping most of its own executives and employees in the dark. And finally, as we are learning, there was an unholy alliance between the car industry and the German government that resulted in weakening the EU's emission standards, prolonging the company's ability to deceive itself and everyone else.
Destruction: Add up all the above, and what do you get? Destruction. Destruction in this case means 35% of shareholder value and tens of billions of dollars in fines (that yet are to be determined), but more important, destruction of trust, of relationships, of the environment. Given all the criminal investigations and class-action suits in the making, it may even eventually mean the self-destruction of the company as a whole--or a government bailout, in which case taxpayers would pay for the company's hubris.
Wait--where have we seen this pattern before? Super-ego-driven leadership is not limited to Volkswagen. We saw the same pattern on Wall Street during the financial crisis. And we still see it there today. The same unholy alliance still exists between the industry and its "regulators," in some ways even more starkly today (Wall Street funds both parties, and in return gets to staff for example the economic team of President Obama in 2008).
It's an interesting phenomenon that the size of a system seems to be inversely related to its enacted intelligence. The bigger the system, the less collective intelligence we can recognize. Across all major global systems today we collectively create results that no one wants (environmental destruction, social disintegration, armed conflict, etc.).
Why is this the case? One of the main drivers, I believe, is a disconnect between the globally interdependent eco-system reality of our world economy on the one hand and the highly fragmented ego-system mindset that we use to operate that economy on the other hand. Fixing that disconnect between eco-system reality and ego-system mindsets is, in my view, the number one leadership challenge today.
The cycle of presencing
So how do we move the mindset in an organization from ego to eco? That brings me back to the wonderful human response of people in some countries--Germany, Sweden, France and some others across Europe--to the refugee crisis (see my last blog entry (http://start.westnet.ca/newstempch.php?article=otto-scharmer/shifting-the-logic-of-col_b_8100068.html)). The characteristics of their response demonstrate the very opposite of the absencing cycle described above. That is:
--Seeing the humanitarian crisis and the individual human beings who are in need of help right now.
--Sensing what their needs are and how compassionate citizens can contribute. As a consequence, citizens start to "sense their own country from the edges," that is, through the eyes of the refugees.
--Connecting to the deeper sources of our humanity, of our being.
--Crystallizing the field of the future that wants to emerge and that "stays in need of us" to bring it into reality.
--Co-creating the future of our society through many local rapid-cycle experiments in order to learn by doing.
http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2015-09-28-1443456997-1856697-ScreenShot20150928at10.18.16AM-thumb.png (http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2015-09-28-1443456997-1856697-ScreenShot20150928at10.18.16AM.png)
The Cycle of Presencing and the Cycle of Absencing (Source: Scharmer, Theory U)
Both of these cycles exist today: the cycle of absencing and self-destruction, and the cycle of presencing--of co-sensing and co-shaping the future as it emerges.
It belong to the signature of our current age that we are torn between these two cycles, between these two social fields. But what accounts for whether a system activates the cycle of presencing or of absencing?
We don't know for sure. But we do know that, in order to activate the co-creative cycle of presencing, we have to develop and strengthen our innate capacity to listen with our mind and heart wide open, and to tune in to what emerges from the edges of our systems.
MITx U.Lab: A Global Movement to Co-shape the Future
That inner capacity can be methodically trained and learned. It revolves around the ability to access three instruments of inner knowing both individually and collectively (Open Mind, Open Heart, Open Will). How to strengthen that capacity is the core of our global leadership challenge today.
It is also the focus of a new massive open online course (MOOC): the MITx U.Lab, (https://www.edx.org/course/transforming-business-society-self-u-lab-mitx-15-671x) which so far has 42,000 registered participants from 183 countries, working in self-organized groups around the world. You can join the movement if you choose to do so: it's online, free, and allows you to bring in and leverage your current initiative for profound change in the context of a global community of change makers. After all, it will take many of us to transform the ego-logic of the fish, that rots from the head down, to the eco-logic of the swarm, in which intelligence and leadership is distributed throughout the entire system. -- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. (http://start.westnet.ca/newstempch.php?article=terms.html/) It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/rc/1/rc.img (http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/rc/1/rc.htm)
http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/rc/2/rc.img (http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/rc/2/rc.htm)
http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/rc/3/rc.img (http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/rc/3/rc.htm)
http://da.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/a2.img (http://da.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/a2.htm)
http://adchoice.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/ach.img (http://adchoice.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/ach.htm)http://pi.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/a2t.imghttp://pi2.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/a2t2.imghttp://feeds.huffingtonpost.com/c/35496/f/677045/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/mf.gif
More... (http://feeds.huffingtonpost.com/c/35496/f/677045/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/l/0L0Shuffingtonpost0N0Cotto0Escharmer0Cthe0Efish0Er ots0Efrom0Ethe0Ehe0Ib0I820A86520Bhtml/story01.htm)
• The field of "absencing," as embodied in the VW story: denial, de-sensing, hubris, deception, and destruction;
• The field of "presencing," as embodied in the response to the refugee crisis: seeing, sensing, stillness, crystallizing, and co-creating.
Much has been said about the moral dimension of the VW diesel deception. The company betrayed its customers, the public, and the planet by building "defeat devices" into 11 million of its cars (devices designed to switch off emission controls whenever the car is in normal use).
But there's a question that has not been answered yet: Why? How can a company that relies so completely on reputation and brand perception behave with such unbelievable stupidity and irresponsibility? Here is how the German newsmagazine Der Spiegel covered the story this week under the header "the suicide."
http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2015-09-28-1443456587-9181056-ScreenShot20150927at12.30.44PM-thumb.png (http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2015-09-28-1443456587-9181056-ScreenShot20150927at12.30.44PM.png)
The company essentially killed itself. How could VW have possibly believed that such a deception would go undiscovered? All it took was a small experiment--with two cars and two measuring devices, and a few hundred miles of driving--initiated by the Berlin office of ICCT, a respected international NGO.
The answer to these questions, to the extent that we know anything today, seems to boil down to seven words: The fish rots from the head down. It's a saying in Germany and other places that means: the problem starts at the top.
The cycle of absencing
The VW disaster is a leadership failure of epic proportion. It's connected to a leadership style and culture that, until now, was the source of incredible pride and success. Until a few days ago, the rise of VW and Audi from a sleepy German carmaker to a global powerhouse with 600,000 employees, 12 different auto brands, and more than 100 factories and plants in 31 countries, was a company saga admired around the world. Yet, the same cultural genes that gave rise to all of VW's successes have suddenly turned into the seeds of its unfolding self-destruction. The firm was and is dominated by old white males obsessed with becoming the world's biggest carmaker. Its top-down and control-based leadership culture, once a source of success, now prevented leaders from reading and recognizing information that, in a culture of fear and control, no one ever wants to communicate upwards - thereby preventing the company from learning as a system.
Lets look at the phenomenology of this learning disability in more detail. Here are five core features that define this "cycle of absencing" (self-destruction):
Denial: VW failed to heed the early warning signals that came its way. These included a letter from its supplier Bosch in 2007 (after VW decided to opt out of BlueTec, an NOx reducing technology co-developed by Bosch and Mercedes), a warning from its corporate revision in 2011, and the sharing from test results by ICCT in 2014 and the EPA in 2015 when the symptoms of the scandal started surfacing. VW dismissed, ignored, or, when confronted with the test results, chose to not address these warnings with an appropriate (open) mind.
De-sensing: The leaders of VW amplified the problems by disconnecting themselves from the values and trajectory of society by entrenching and isolating themselves in what another executive in the auto industry once called a "bullshit-castle"--that is, a world that is cut off from the emerging societal future such as the environmental movement. Germany, probably more than any other major industrial country, has been strongly shaped an influenced by the environmental movement. That VW, a Germany company, thought it was an option to install defeat devices that lie to the consumer and to the public about its actual emission demonstrates a breathtaking level of cynicism and disconnection from the ecological and societal realities of our time.
Hubris: No engineer wakes up in the morning and thinks: OK, today I want to build devices that deceive our customers and destroy our planet. Yet it happened. Why? Because of hubris at the top. VW's relentless pursuit of its goal to be bigger than anyone else produced huge internal pressure to increase volume and reduce costs. "Clean diesel" was a big part of this strategy. Add to that a top-down culture that didn't tolerate anyone who said, "We can't do that." That pressure set a context that made VW decline the use of BlueTec (presumably too costly) and turn to an internal solution instead.
Deception: Deception and manipulation show up in many forms. Volkswagen deceived its customers, the public and of course governmental agencies like the EPA. But it also deceived itself. Even though the information about the diesel deception scandal continued to surface and was communicated to the company by the ICCP (in 2014) and the EPA (in 2015)--the company continued to sail on its collision path, keeping most of its own executives and employees in the dark. And finally, as we are learning, there was an unholy alliance between the car industry and the German government that resulted in weakening the EU's emission standards, prolonging the company's ability to deceive itself and everyone else.
Destruction: Add up all the above, and what do you get? Destruction. Destruction in this case means 35% of shareholder value and tens of billions of dollars in fines (that yet are to be determined), but more important, destruction of trust, of relationships, of the environment. Given all the criminal investigations and class-action suits in the making, it may even eventually mean the self-destruction of the company as a whole--or a government bailout, in which case taxpayers would pay for the company's hubris.
Wait--where have we seen this pattern before? Super-ego-driven leadership is not limited to Volkswagen. We saw the same pattern on Wall Street during the financial crisis. And we still see it there today. The same unholy alliance still exists between the industry and its "regulators," in some ways even more starkly today (Wall Street funds both parties, and in return gets to staff for example the economic team of President Obama in 2008).
It's an interesting phenomenon that the size of a system seems to be inversely related to its enacted intelligence. The bigger the system, the less collective intelligence we can recognize. Across all major global systems today we collectively create results that no one wants (environmental destruction, social disintegration, armed conflict, etc.).
Why is this the case? One of the main drivers, I believe, is a disconnect between the globally interdependent eco-system reality of our world economy on the one hand and the highly fragmented ego-system mindset that we use to operate that economy on the other hand. Fixing that disconnect between eco-system reality and ego-system mindsets is, in my view, the number one leadership challenge today.
The cycle of presencing
So how do we move the mindset in an organization from ego to eco? That brings me back to the wonderful human response of people in some countries--Germany, Sweden, France and some others across Europe--to the refugee crisis (see my last blog entry (http://start.westnet.ca/newstempch.php?article=otto-scharmer/shifting-the-logic-of-col_b_8100068.html)). The characteristics of their response demonstrate the very opposite of the absencing cycle described above. That is:
--Seeing the humanitarian crisis and the individual human beings who are in need of help right now.
--Sensing what their needs are and how compassionate citizens can contribute. As a consequence, citizens start to "sense their own country from the edges," that is, through the eyes of the refugees.
--Connecting to the deeper sources of our humanity, of our being.
--Crystallizing the field of the future that wants to emerge and that "stays in need of us" to bring it into reality.
--Co-creating the future of our society through many local rapid-cycle experiments in order to learn by doing.
http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2015-09-28-1443456997-1856697-ScreenShot20150928at10.18.16AM-thumb.png (http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2015-09-28-1443456997-1856697-ScreenShot20150928at10.18.16AM.png)
The Cycle of Presencing and the Cycle of Absencing (Source: Scharmer, Theory U)
Both of these cycles exist today: the cycle of absencing and self-destruction, and the cycle of presencing--of co-sensing and co-shaping the future as it emerges.
It belong to the signature of our current age that we are torn between these two cycles, between these two social fields. But what accounts for whether a system activates the cycle of presencing or of absencing?
We don't know for sure. But we do know that, in order to activate the co-creative cycle of presencing, we have to develop and strengthen our innate capacity to listen with our mind and heart wide open, and to tune in to what emerges from the edges of our systems.
MITx U.Lab: A Global Movement to Co-shape the Future
That inner capacity can be methodically trained and learned. It revolves around the ability to access three instruments of inner knowing both individually and collectively (Open Mind, Open Heart, Open Will). How to strengthen that capacity is the core of our global leadership challenge today.
It is also the focus of a new massive open online course (MOOC): the MITx U.Lab, (https://www.edx.org/course/transforming-business-society-self-u-lab-mitx-15-671x) which so far has 42,000 registered participants from 183 countries, working in self-organized groups around the world. You can join the movement if you choose to do so: it's online, free, and allows you to bring in and leverage your current initiative for profound change in the context of a global community of change makers. After all, it will take many of us to transform the ego-logic of the fish, that rots from the head down, to the eco-logic of the swarm, in which intelligence and leadership is distributed throughout the entire system. -- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. (http://start.westnet.ca/newstempch.php?article=terms.html/) It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/rc/1/rc.img (http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/rc/1/rc.htm)
http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/rc/2/rc.img (http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/rc/2/rc.htm)
http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/rc/3/rc.img (http://rc.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/rc/3/rc.htm)
http://da.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/a2.img (http://da.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/a2.htm)
http://adchoice.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/ach.img (http://adchoice.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/ach.htm)http://pi.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/a2t.imghttp://pi2.feedsportal.com/r/238386567930/u/0/f/677045/c/35496/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/a2t2.imghttp://feeds.huffingtonpost.com/c/35496/f/677045/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/mf.gif
More... (http://feeds.huffingtonpost.com/c/35496/f/677045/s/4a3a873c/sc/24/l/0L0Shuffingtonpost0N0Cotto0Escharmer0Cthe0Efish0Er ots0Efrom0Ethe0Ehe0Ib0I820A86520Bhtml/story01.htm)