![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Chicago Tribune apparently decided the approaching 10th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina was a great hook for an op-ed extolling the cleansing and restorative virtues of a natural disaster that left 1,833 people dead.
"In Chicago, Wishing For A Hurricane Katrina," written by Tribune Editorial board member Kristen McQueary, drew immediate backlash online. The original headline and more offensive passages were quickly scrubbed without any annotation, but the original text and headline can be read here. McQueary compared the political corruption, financial distress and ruinous school system of pre-Katrina New Orleans to present-day Chicago, writing:
It would be hard to call a city that survived Katrina lucky, but McQueary insists that the hurricane "gave a great American city a rebirth." The column naively assesses the city's gains as a result of the hurricane: the "overthrow" of a corrupt government, a smaller city budget, forced unpaid furloughs, cut positions, "detonated labor contracts" and a school system unburdened by teachers union demands. Today, New Orleans rates 14th in the nation for political corruption (which is only respectable relative to Chicago's first-place ranking); furloughs cut costs, but in some cases simply pushed the burden elsewhere; and a report out Thursday by the Cowen Institute at Tulane University shows the post-Katrina school system is still in flux. But the city finances, at least, are in better shape than 10 years ago. Based on readers' reactions on social media, the op-ed was not very persuasive: @StatehouseChick As journalist/one of the primary citizens who overthrew corrupt government, no idea how offensive this piece is to us. .@StatehouseChick Healthy cities aren't borne of disaster. They're erected with intention. Wishing for storms is disingenuous and cruel. @StatehouseChick Would you have said, "what Chicago needs is a 9/11" or "it's own 1906 San Francisco earthquake?" McQueary did not immediately respond to The Huffington Post's request for comment. She did, however, defend her column after the backlash began, tweeting: If you read the piece, it's about finances and government. I would never diminish the tragedy of thousands of lives lost. The most objectionable passage -- which was later changed on the sly -- was especially out-of-touch with the real-life human toll of Katrina (which hit poor black residents the hardest). Per the op-ed: As a reminder, here are some images of what actual residents of New Orleans experienced during Katrina: -- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website. ![]() More... |