Calgaryn.com - Everything Calgary Forums  

Go Back   Calgaryn.com - Everything Calgary Forums > General > US Headlines
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 04-07-2012, 03:13 AM
news news is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,888,471
Default Obama Embraces National Security as Campaign Issue

Reply With Quote
  #1  
Old 11-18-2015, 08:59 PM
news news is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,888,471
Default Oklahoma Expands Rights For Same-Sex Parents

TULSA, Okla., Nov 17 (Reuters) - The Oklahoma Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that custodial rights to children of same-sex couples in a union before gay marriage was legalized in the United States can be granted.

The court reversed and remanded an Oklahoma County District Court ruling as it expanded the rights of non-custodial parents in same-sex relationships.

Charlene Ramey and Kimberly Sutton separated two years before Oklahoma was ordered by U.S. courts to recognize same-sex marriages. During their eight-year relationship, the two decided to have a child together, with Sutton as the biological mother.

Earlier this year, the Oklahoma County District Court dismissed Ramey's case for a temporary order granting custody of the couple's child on the grounds that she was not the biological parent, was never married to Sutton and did not have a written co-parenting agreement in place that could be enforced.

In Tuesday's decision, the Oklahoma Supreme Court dismissed the lower court's claim that Ramey was an interloper and explicitly acknowledged family decisions made by same-sex couples before the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark ruling this year that legalized gay marriage nationally.

"Ramey is not a mere 'third party' like a nanny, friend, or relative, as suggested by the district court," the ruling states.

"On the contrary, Ramey has been intimately involved in the conception, birth and parenting of their child, at the request and invitation of Sutton," it said adding Ramey has been a parent to their child and always been referred to as "Mom" by their child.

Last year, the court upheld the rights of another non-biological mother in a similar situation, but who had a written co-parenting agreement in place with the custodial parent. (Editing by Jon Herskovitz and Jonathan Oatis)

Also on HuffPost:

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.












More...
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2000-2013 Calgaryn.com